SECTION III: BASIC
ELEMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH
AND SAFETY PROGRAM
C) HAZARD
REPORTING AND CORRECTION
PURPOSE
To provide a systematic means whereby safety hazards can
be reported and channeled to the proper personnel for appropriate response.
PROCEDURES
1. Reporting a hazardous condition
Hazards can be noted and reported by any CCS
employee. Notation of an existing hazard
may result from personal observation or from review of a completed Accident/Incident
Report form or of a Building Self-Inspection Safety Survey.
A.
A hazardous
condition should first be verbally reported to the immediate supervisor.
B.
Some hazardous
conditions should be reported on a Building Improvement Request form (e.g., a
hazard which involves a minor correction to a facility, such as an electrical
outlet needing replacement; a loose piece of carpeting, etc.).
C.
Some hazardous
conditions should be dealt with through established purchasing procedures
(e.g., when the hazard involves equipment within the building, the supervisor
might call in a maintenance vendor, working through his/her administrator and
the CCS Business Office).
D.
The Hazardous
Condition Report form is available through Environmental Health and Safety
Committee members, campus supply, or by contacting the CCS Environmental Health
and Safety Office (475-7041). It should
be completed:
·
when verbal
reporting of a hazardous condition does not achieve correction of the hazard;
·
when it is not
appropriate for correction via a Building Improvement Request or for repair by
a maintenance vendor;
·
when correction of a hazard would have major facility and/or
economic impact and requires input from numerous individuals to work through
the issues involved.
The completed Hazardous Condition
Report is to be routed as indicated on the form, for purposes of follow-up, and
for notification of appropriate health and safety
personnel and those supervisor(s) whose area(s) may be affected.
Regardless of final disposition, all
completed Hazardous Condition Report forms are to be routed through the
appropriate Environmental Health and Safety Committee and the CCS Environmental
Health and Safety Steering Committee.
2. Hazard Evaluation and Disposition
The responsibility for evaluation and disposition of a
reported hazardous condition is shared by many.
For instance, hazard evaluation and disposition might, as appropriate,
involve any or all of these individuals:
·
supervisor of the
affected area;
·
administrator of
the affected area;
·
safety officer
(SCC, SFCC, IEL, or District, as appropriate);
·
Environmental
Health and Safety Committee;
·
CCS Environmental
Health and Safety Professional.
A.
First-level responsibility - Supervisor: The supervisor is
expected to accomplish timely correction of minor hazardous conditions. If the hazard correction involves the
changing of an established procedure, the responsible supervisor will insure
that all persons affected are informed of the change. When correction of a hazardous condition
would have major procedural, facility and/or economic impact, the supervisor is
to notify their administrator and refer the hazard to the appropriate safety
officer.
B.
Second-level responsibility - Safety Officer: The safety
officer will ensure that appropriate parties (e.g., administrator of the
affected area, Environmental Health and Safety Committee, and the CCS
Environmental Health and Safety Office) are involved in review, recommendations
and the decision-making process regarding disposition of a hazardous condition
which is of major significance.
Corrective Actions (Following Evaluation)
Disposition and response to a reported
hazard calls for “action" or "no action," with recommendations
and/or explanation, as appropriate. The
Disposition section of the Hazardous Condition Report is to be completed by:
the supervisor,
the safety officer, or,
staff of the CCS Environmental Health and Safety Office.
Action Taken:
A.
Where it is
determined that the reported hazard requires corrective action, orderly and
efficient planning is essential, even when this will involve long-term planning
for correction of a major hazard.
B.
When correction of
a reported hazard is pending, the immediate supervisor or the safety officer,
as appropriate, is responsible for implementation of temporary measures to
mitigate the hazard and for monitoring progress of the hazard corrective
action, to assure that delay is minimized and that completion of the corrective
action occurs.
C.
While the
individual who initiated the Hazardous Condition Report may have included
recommendations for correction of the hazard, the authorized respondent may
recommend implementation of an alternative solution instead.
D.
When it is
determined that complete elimination of the hazard is not possible or
economically feasible, other actions should be taken (e.g. guarding, use of
protective equipment, warning signs, establishing safety procedures, etc.).
No Action Taken:
A.
There may be
instances where a hazard is perceived to exist (e.g., by the individual who
completed a Hazardous Condition Report) but where evaluation by the supervisor,
the safety officer, and/or staff of the CCS Environmental Health and Safety
Office, as appropriate, determines that corrective action is not required
(e.g., the condition reported is not out of compliance with existing
regulations; corrective action is not economically feasible in terms of the
level of hazard and/or would be precedent setting in terms of other, similar
settings within CCS jurisdiction; etc.).
B.
Where "no
action" is taken, the appropriate respondent (supervisor, safety officer,
or staff of the CCS Environmental Health and Safety Office) will document the
reason(s) and communicate this information to the originator of the Hazardous
Condition Report.